RED MIST
Red Mist
It’s always been popular to pitch a new idea for a film as a combination of two things that already exist. The famous “______ meets ______” formula helps make it easier for studio executives and fans alike to digest the fresh concept by comparing it not one but two things that they know in advance. Of course, there are some inherent flaws in this system: it instantly states that there is little originality in the new project, as it rips off two works, and those original works will invariably be far superior to this hybrid child. When I watched The Red Mist, I couldn’t help but view it as “I Know What You Did Last Summer meets Shocker.” Considering that I was never a big fan of the former (though Lois Duncan’s novel is quite a good read) and many fans of the latter don’t find it to be among Wes Craven’s best work, that does not bode well for the film. Though moderately enjoyable, director Paddy Breathnach’s final product offers nothing that hasn’t been done before, in two separate movies.
The film begins with mentally deficient hospital worker Kenneth in the morgue, intercut with scenes of what I inferred to be young Kenneth watching a woman get beaten to death by her lover. Kenneth has a knack for playing with his camera phone, which becomes a key plot point later, though Breathnach leaves the obsession underdeveloped (similarly, Chromeskull had an obsession with recording things in Laid to Rest, which I recently reviewed. An odd coincidence, or a trend in horror?) Cut to a scene where a group of med students lose a patient in a simulated operation. Catherine is automatically going to be our Heroine, because she’s the only who cares about this, and she’s pretty but a little on the plain side. Kenneth, though, apparently thinks she’s gorgeous, as he films her, fully clothed mind you, in the ladies’ locker room. Later, when our group has to prove that they’re every cliche of college students, they go to blow off some steam at a local bar and party a lot more than they should. When Kenneth arrives, they blow him off. But after a series of events, they manage to damn near kill him. Catherine wants to call an ambulance and do the right thing, because she’s obviously the Good Girl, but Sean suggests they leave him to die, and under resistance, that they dump him on the road in front of their hospital. He does so because he’s obviously the Careless Affluent Jerk. All parties swear they will never speak of the event again, because this is obviously I Know What You Did After You Failed the Simulated Operation.
The second act takes the film in a totally different direction. Catherine tries some radical, unproven technique on Kenneth’s comatose body, because she is so obviously the Savior/Helper. Unfortunately, she’s not exactly the Great Doctor; so she inadvertently gives Kenneth the ability to exert his will from beyond his own body. This can only get ugly, because in true Shocker fashion, Kenneth has so obviously become the Beyond the Door of Death Killer. In predictable fashion, he invades the bodies of several other people and does his best to dispatch the group of so obviously Hot & Trendy Med Students.
Even if this movie were not a concoction derived from two ill-fitting parents, there are several other inherent problems with it. Every character down to the last comes straight from the Generic Stereotype Generator. Cardboard cut outs populate this film, which does the predictable plot no favors. Given these limitations, the actors do little to expand on the character types. Only Arielle Kebbel does anything to distinguish herself from her one-dimensional character, as her facial expressions and voice convey concern for Kenneth, but even then the character is thin. The film’s biggest sin, though, is that it gives me nobody to sympathize with. First it asks me to root for a retard stalker who’s potentially harmful, and then it asks me to shift my sympathies to a group of snotty brats who almost kill said retard. If I didn’t like Catherine (hey, I’ve always been a goody goody myself), I would’ve shut this movie off 20 minutes into it. But even her character cannot save the film from being so-so at best.
The one thing I really liked about the film was the recurring motif of Catherine running. Metaphorically, at the beginning of the film she’s running into the problem at the bar; later, she’s alternately running to try and fix things, or running away from the bar incident. This also showcases the film’s location in Northern Ireland, as she runs on rainy days where foreboding sky always threatens rain. Interestingly, there’s plenty of mist in the film, but not a drop of it is red. The film’s original title was Freakdog, a reference to Kenneth’s nickname, and a more fitting moniker.
The DVD showcases a few extras. “The Making of RED MIST” is a suitable title for the behind-the-scenes featurette, because it’s as creatively bankrupt as the rest of the film; it runs 21 minutes long, and is exactly what you would expect from something bearing that title. At least Arielle Kebbel looks really cute in it. She looks just as appealing in “Arielle Kebbel (‘Catherine Thomas’): Extended Interview,” which is, to no surprise, an extended interview with the actress. She’s not likely to win an Oscar, but at least I know she’s invested in the character and the script. It runs about nine minutes long. At four minutes, “The RED MIST Cast in Northern Ireland” rounds out the package. Kebbel compliments the country, and I wonder if it’s possible for her to have a negative thought about anything. This is a fluff piece at its finest.
In the world of “______ meets ______,” The Red Mist could easily have been titled “I Know What You Did Last Summer meets Shocker.” If only as a film it weren’t Mixture of Two Ideas meets Mediocre Filmmaking. Kebbel shows some promise, so hopefully her next film will be Arielle meets Better Movie.
--Phil Fasso